Islamic Fiqh > Financial transactions > Istisna (manufacture to order)
Istisna: the manufacture-to-order contract, its differences with salam, its status before and after work, and partial payment.
Contents
Updated on 31 August 2026 at 3:55 AM
Istisna is the commission of manufacture: a defined product against a known price, manufacture being the attribute of the contract. For the Hanafis the contract is valid by istihsan and by the continuous practice of people in every era, despite the refusal of analogy, since selling what one does not own was forbidden except for salam. Its effects: the commissioned product becomes a debt owed by the maker, and the price belongs to the maker as non-binding ownership. Abu Hanifa held both parties free before manufacture; Abu Yusuf and Muhammad hold the contract binding, and the Majalla (article 392) took this view: no withdrawal even before manufacture, unless the product delivered differs from the contracted attributes, in which case the client has the option.
If the client provides the material and pays a wage (iron to a blacksmith, leather to a shoemaker), the contract is a hire, not an istisna.
For the Malikis, Shafi'is and Hanbalis, istisna as an independent contract is not valid; it stands as a salam with all the conditions of salam: capital paid in the session, precise description, a term. The Malikis forbid specifying the raw material (iron, for instance) or a particular worker, because of the gharar this introduces; they allow ordered purchase modeled on a salam term without such specification. The Hanbalis state that selling a good on the condition of manufacturing it is not valid outside the salam form. ash-Shafi'i in the Umm validated the combined structure: buying the material from the craftsman and hiring his work in one contract.
For any manufacturing order, the fiqh checklist is short: described product, known price, payment terms, and a clear choice between the binding salam form and the free commission.