Sulh (amicable settlement)

Islamic Fiqh > Financial transactions > Sulh (amicable settlement)

Amicable settlement: its three types (with acknowledgment, with denial, with silence), its status, conditions and effects.

Updated on 24 September 2026 at 12:48 AM

The ruling of sulh

Sulh is the amiable settlement that ends a dispute over wealth or rights. It is lawful by consensus (al-Mawardi, Ibn Qudamah, Ibn Rushd, al-Imrani), recommended in itself; it may become obligatory when it preserves a necessary interest, and forbidden when it entails an unavoidable corruption. The judge urges both parties toward sulh while the truth is unclear to him: Umar wrote to Abu Musa: "press for settlement so long as the judgment has not become clear to you"; once the right is established, judgment applies.

O Ka'b, drop half. He said: I have done so, Messenger of Allah. He said: rise and collect the rest.al-Bukhari 2563, Muslim 1558

The types of sulh

  • Sulh with acknowledgment (iqrar): the defendant admits the right and settles; the rules of sale apply when it has consideration (rescission, defect, options for the Hanafis); the Malikis rank it as sale, hire or gift; the Shafi'is hold it exchange or remission.
  • Sulh with denial and with silence: valid for the majority (Hanafis, Malikis, Hanbalis), the silent party being possibly an acknowledger or a denier; invalid for the Shafi'is, since paying under silence approaches bribery.

What sulh bears on

It is valid on bodily injury compensation, on housing and on the defect of a sold good, and on everything against which a compensation may be taken; in intentional killing, the verse frames the compensation consented by the next of kin (Quran 2:178).

Forbidden settlements

  • The hudud of Allah: "Every settlement over an unjust term is revocable" (al-Bukhari 2695, Muslim 1697); the Shafi'is state it plainly: no paid settlement wards off a penalty, the penalty being a right of Allah.
  • Dropping part of a deferred debt against partial immediate payment ("reduce it and hasten"): invalid for the four schools (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, Hanbali madhhab): it sells the term against the dropped amount, the mirror image of increasing the debt for a delay. Malik reports in the Muwatta that Zayd ibn Thabit said of such a scheme: "I neither order you to take it nor to commission it"; an-Nawawi rules that a thousand deferred settled at five hundred now is void. Dropping part of a due debt, with no acceleration condition, is valid (hadith of Ka'b).

Practical note on sulh

A sound sulh keeps two safeguards: no right of Allah is traded in it, and no term of a debt is sold in it. Beyond these two limits, renouncing part of one's right in kindness remains a recommended path.

The evidence among the classical schools

Bada'i al-Sana'i by al-Kasani · Hanafi school

because the sulh (settlement) upon one hundred against the teeth of the diya is the acquisition of the right in substance; and if the judge determined what is due and judged against him in dirhams, then the liable one settled for two thousand dinars, that is permitted, and taking possession in the session is necessary, as if the killer did so of himself, for it is sarf (money exchange): its conditions are therefore observed, and Allah, the Most High, knows best.

Al-Mughni by Ibn Qudama · Hanbali school

Here he was not prevented from acquitting it, but he acknowledged it and settled with him against it, while giving it to him: it thus resembles the case where he had not denied it.

Question 818; he said: "Whoever acknowledges a right, then settles upon part of it: that is not a sulh, for it is an amputation of the right".

Other pages of this pillar

Explore other sections

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Thu 11 Rabi' al-Thani
الخميس 11 ربيع الآخر
أحدب متزايد Waxing Gibbous Day 12.2 / 29.5
Illumination 93%
Full moon in 3 days
لا إله إلا الله There is no god but Allah